Questions considered by Russia to be of key importance to the ongoing conflict in Syria were absent from the Tuesday night show with Christiane Amanpour.
The first concerned Assad’s role in the interim period, which the Russian envoy said should be up to the people and no one else.
Churkin calls attention to the “fact of life that many Syrians, a large segment of the Syrian population, are supporting President Assad, [which] has to be taken into account.”
“So let's have the dialogue started and let's allow the Syrians to decide what kind of path they need to take to end this conflict," the envoy stressed.
The unedited version of Churkin’s words appears on the website of Russia’s permanent mission to the UN.
Another topic, which CNN felt was unnecessary in the final version of the Amanpour show, was to do with the rebels’ role in the conflict. The envoy said that any conditions they might have for joining the upcoming Geneva talks should be put aside in favor of the bigger picture – which is getting to the table.
Despite the apparent differences in how Russia and Western powers view resolution of the Syrian crisis, the necessity of the upcoming January 22, 2014 event is something both agree on and have worked hard to promote, albeit with emphasis on different things.
The repeatedly delayed peace talks will bring together Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government and the opposition for the first time since the bloody conflict began in March of 2011.
Despite their confirmed participation, the warring sides likewise see the talks going in two completely different directions. The rebels see the event as a platform for the removal of Assad from power, as its specific aim; while Assad has stated that he has no intention of leaving office, but has repeatedly voiced his support for a bloodless, diplomatic solution. The country’s Foreign Ministry has said that its representatives will be going to Geneva not to hand over power to anyone, but to meet with those “who support a political solution for Syria's future,” AP quoted the statement as saying on Wednesday.
Another of Churkin’s comments cut by the Amanpour show about the rebels concerned the concerted efforts on their part to hamper humanitarian aid delivery to the war-stricken population.
Churkin made it clear that the latter is being done by the insurgents in agreement with their foreign sponsors.
Drawing a comparison between the warring sides, Churkin said that achieving progress on the humanitarian front is much easier where Damascus is concerned, but this was not the case with the rebels, because “nobody knows who is influencing those hundreds, or dozens at least, of armed groups on the ground," the envoy explained.
"We need to identify those countries and they need to assume responsibility for dealing with those groups so that they will not prevent the evacuation of the population from besieged areas," Churkin added, alluding to the problem of the evacuation of IDPs (internally displaced persons) from volatile areas.
“Because over the past few months,” he went on, “there have been a number of situations when the Syrian government agreed to the evacuation of the population, but the opposition groups prevented that from happening."
And finally, Russia’s UN envoy touched on a point that he believes has received little to no coverage in Western media, and that is the evidence that unambiguously points to the rebels’ apparent disinterest in alleviating the suffering of the people whose wellbeing they claim to care for:
"Whenever the population is leaving various besieged areas they move to the territories controlled by the Syrian government, it says a lot about whom the population is relying on for providing humanitarian support".
‘It is beyond professionalism or understanding’
Speaking to ITAR-TASS, Russia’s UN representative expressed regret that the complete interview did not make the CNN cut and censored ‘the most crucial’ issues to the resolution of the Syrian crisis.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, said that “the fact that CNN has cut some crucial points on Syria from the Churkin interview goes way beyond the bounds of professionalism, or even understanding… such moves by Western media aimed at removing bits and pieces of information it deems “unnecessary” to its viewers’ broader understanding, are becoming the rule and not the exception – especially where Russian officials are concerned.”
Any attempts by CNN to justify and explain their actions, for instance by limited on-air time or irrelevance of edited pieces, are baseless, Zakharova said.
"I don't know whether the US Ambassador to the Russian Federation, Michael McFaul, who has so many times criticized Russian media outlets, will comment on this situation with the American channel, but I know that Vitaly Churkin is a professional, is perfectly fluent in English and is a welcomed guest at all the world's media," Zakharova said.
CNN representative Jonathan Hawkins claimed that Christiane Amanpour’s team had made it clear in advance that the interview would be edited before being aired.
“This is a regular practice for pre-recorded interviews. We never distort the meaning of the interview,” Hawkins told Itar-Tass.
Hawkins said that CNN was also preparing a full transcript of the interview with Churkin, which would be published at cnn.com and amanpour.com.
(Note: Hardly more than two decades ago, American and western politicians grabbed every opportunity to ridicule the Eastern countries for lack of freedom of the press and other shortcomings pointing out the superiority of western democracies. Two decades later the largest U.S. TV networks are pursuing the very same censorship policies that characterized the Stalinist regimes of the Eastern block countries during the cold war era. And those once despised now have taken up the responsibility to defend the fundamentals rights and freedoms against those that a little while ago managed to dupe people into believing that they were the true champions of human rights. What a turn of events!)