Treaty to accept Crimea, Sevastopol to Russian Federation signed

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Russia and Crimea have signed treaty of accession of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol in the Russian Federation following President Putin’s address to the Parliament.

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin requests parliament to ratify the agreement that would see both Crimea and the city of Sevastopol joining Russia.

“I ask you to consider the adoption of two new subjects of the Federation: Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol,” Putin told Parliamentarians.

Crimea was represented by Prime Minister Sergey Aksenov and Sevastopol mayor Aleksey Chaly, who signed the treaty. The two were accompanied by Crimean top official Vladimir Konstantinov.

“Since the adoption of the Russian Federation Republic of Crimea in structure of the Russian Federation two new entities - of the Republic of Crimea and the city of Federal importance Sevastopol – have been created,” the text of the treaty reads.

The Treaty enumerates 10 articles which will come into effect after ratification.

Russia will guarantee that the people who live in Crimea and Sevastopol will be given the right to keep their native language as well as the means and conditions for learning it.

Thus, article 3 of the treaty stands that there will be three official languages in Crimea and Sevastopol: Ukrainian, Russian and the language of Crimean Tatars.

Starting from the day of accession, the people of Crimea and Sevastopol are considered as Russian citizens, according to Article 5.

As it was agreed, the transition period will be acting till January 1, 2015. During this time, both sides will resolve the issues of integration of the new subjects “in the economic, financial, credit and legal system of the Russian Federation.”Crimea has already officially introduced the ruble as a second currency along with the Ukrainian hryvna, which will remain an official currency until January 1, 2016.

National elections to the state bodies of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol have been slated for September 2015. Until then the now acting Parliament of Crimea and the Council of Ministers of Crimea as well as the Legislative Assembly of the city of Sevastopol will continue their work.

The document will be sent for approval to the constitutional court, and then to ratification in the parliaments of the two countries.

Treaty signing came after President Putin’s address to the Federal Assembly.

Putin stressed that the results of the referendum, in which more than 83 percent of Crimean residents came to polling stations and more than 96 percent of those voted for rejoining Russia, leave no room for equivocation.

The referendum on independence in Crimea was conducted in strict accordance with democratic principles and international law, he pointed out. He dismissed criticism of the Crimean referendum, citing Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence as an example of self-determination praised by the West.

The president recalled the history of Crimea, saying its cultural, religious and spiritual ties bind it with the peoples of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, which explains the attitude Russians have towards the peninsula.

"There are graves of Russian soldiers on the peninsula whose courage enabled Russia to make Crimea part of the Russian Empire in 1783," Putin said. "Russians, Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars and other peoples lived side by side in Crimea preserving their originality, traditions, language and religion."

He said Crimea had dark pages in its past, particularly the persecution of Crimean Tatars and other minorities in the USSR. The authorities of Crimea seek to recompense for those ills. One such move would be accepting the language of Crimean Tatars as an official language in Crimea on a par with Russian and Ukrainian.

Putin lashed out at former Soviet leader, Nikita Khrushchev, under whose rule Crimea was attached to Soviet Ukraine without any regard for Crimeans’ wishes and in violation of the laws of the time.

Crimean separation from Russia was reinforced again after the split of the Soviet Union, Putin said. This could be partially blamed on Moscow too, as it hailed the so-called “parade of sovereignty” of the Soviet Republics.

Russia has since respected the results of the USSR’s dissolution, including Crimea being part of Ukraine.
Russia’s position was based on the assumption that Ukraine would remain a friendly partner respecting the historic ties between the two countries. Russia continues and will continue to view these relations as very important, the president said.

Putin criticized several governments in Kiev for neglecting average Ukrainians, seeing the country as a source of profit.

He said he sympathized with Ukrainians who took to the streets of Kiev in protest against President Yanukovich, whom they saw as profoundly corrupt.

But the current authorities who replaced Yanukovich after an armed coup are to a large degree controlled by radical nationalists, Putin stated.

Those same radicals have voiced threats against Ukrainians who resist their rule, particularly those living in Crimea.
Turning a blind eye to those threats and the moves of the current authorities, which violated the rights of ethnic Russians in Ukraine, would be betrayal on the part of Russia, Putin said.

(Russia Today)

(Notes: Western leaders are hysterical over the annexation of Crimea by Russia; from their point of view, this is understandable as their age-old way of partitioning a target country violently into hostile parts in the spirit of divide and conquer has been exposed. This is how they divided Hungary in 1919; then, there was no referendum like in Crimea and no one asked the Hungarian people in what country they wanted to live. Crimea held up a mirror to the arrogant puppets of Washington and Brussels and obviously they don't like what they see – a peaceful readjustment of a historical wrong as they always prefer bloodshed to peaceful resolutions (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and so on and so forth). In Crimea, the champions of double standards have received a lesson from democracy. The Crimean referendum was a democratic expression of the will of the people as they themselves could decide on their future. There are very few instances in the modern history of the world when this kind of peaceful resolution of a historical injustice have taken place. Most of the time the evildoers by using their local agents employ violence to pretend solution; the result is always more violence camouflaged by props of democracy. Vladimir Putin was quite right when said the following to western leaders after signing the annexation document. The Americans said in connection to the situation in Kosovo: The Kosovo declaration of independence violates domestic laws, but this does not mean that international law can suffer harm. "They themselves said this, and trumpeted it around the world; they forced everyone to accept it and now, they are outraged. I wonder why" said Putin.)


Anonymous said...

Painful Adjustments Await Ukraine in Europe’s Not So Shiny ‘Recovery’

Ukraine: U.S. Pulls Back, Agrees To Russian Demands

95.7% of Crimeans Give The Finger To The White House Tyrant — Paul Craig Roberts

Two Steps Forward, One Step Back — Paul Craig Roberts

Washington’s plan to seize Ukraine and to evict Russia from its Black Sea naval base has come amiss. But to turn around Lenin’s quote, “two steps forward, one step back.”

Do you remember all the tough talk coming from John Kerry, the White House Fool, Hilary Clinton, and the lickspittle Merkel about the harsh sanctions that would “badly damage” the Russian economy unless Russia prevented the referendum vote in Crimea? Well, it was all bullshit, more hot air from the White House sock puppet and the lickspittle German chancellor who is a disgrace to the German nation. As the Russians kept telling John Kerry, sanctions on Russia would destroy Europe and do little damage to Russia.

I wish the Russians had kept this to themselves. I was looking forward to the Washington morons destroying NATO by closing down the European economy...
The people who decided that Crimea would disassociate from Ukraine and return to Russia were the people themselves. Under the wording of Obama’s stupid sanctions, his sanctions should apply to the Crimean people who voted to disassociate from the US stooge government in Kiev....
What the incompetent White House Fool overlooked is that southern and eastern Ukraine are Russian, not Ukrainian, so the fool’s coup has caused Crimea to depart and is causing widespread protests in eastern Ukraine against Washington’s stooge unelected government in Kiev. Washington’s stooge Kiev government has appointed unelected Ukrainian multibillionaire oligarchs, who have their own private security forces, as mayors of the Russian cities to put down the protests....

Anonymous said...

The elites play ethnic groups off against each other to maintain power - this is how the Hapsburgs maintained control. The 99.999% of Urainians - Ukrainians, Russians, Hungarians, Tartars, etc. are part of the working class. The common problem is the 0.001% - the Oligarchs (60 - 100 families) who control 90% of the wealth - whether - Ukrainian, Russian, dual Israeli citizen, International Mafia Fund IMF, EU or transnational corporations. This is the common problem to the 99.999%.

Painful Adjustments Await Ukraine in Europe’s Not So Shiny ‘Recovery’

The mainstream U.S. press explains the overwhelming Crimean vote to leave Ukraine as vote-rigging or coercion, but the reality is that “European aspirations” are not so attractive to people aware of the painful life for many in the EU’s “periphery,” from Spain to Greece...

What the Western Media Won’t Tell You: Crimean Tatars and Ukrainians Also Voted to Join Russia

Media reports acknowledge that 83.1 percent of eligible Crimean voters cast their ballot in the March 16th referendum.

The final tally of the vote was 96.77 percent in favor of joining the Russian Federation, and 2.51 percent against...

Putin: Crimea similar to Kosovo, West is rewriting its own rule book

West and Neo-Nazism in Ukraine (I)

About a hundred years have passed as Anglo-Saxon elite made another attempt to use Nazism for launching a ram attack against Russia. This time the role of Germany in the 1930s is to be played by Ukraine of our time, or to be more precise, the segment of Ukraine’s society which has failed to draw lessons from WWII. The five months of Ukraine’s «nationalist revolution» offer ample food for thought allowing to get to the bottom of what is behind the staged coup, what goals it pursues and who acts as its driving force…

Post a Comment

Comments using obscene language, or comments calling for hate and violence will be deleted.